Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
Electronic Discovery in Practice: Discovery and ethics in the technology era
A lecture presented by the Cardozo Cyberlaw Society, featuring Mr. Paul W. Garrity, Partner, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, on Columbus Day, Monday, October 8, 2007.
Technology has been changing the way law is practiced. It can increase efficiency, allow for greater flexibility and provides many other benefits. It also can add much complexity to the process of discovery. Law firms are learning how to deal with the massive amount of work sifting through potentially terabytes of data, looking for what they must provide their opponents, while screening out material that is privileged. In addition, lawyers often face related questions, both technical and ethical:
– What do you do if your opponent sends you an email with metadata that reveals confidential information?
– Who should bear the cost of discovery when it pertains to searching and restoring data from 1980, on ancient storage medium?
– What issues are involved in outsourcing e-discovery to specialized firms?
Every attorney must recognize these issues when they arise – ignoring them comes at the peril of malpractice.
Mr. Garrity, a partner at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, is an expert on legal technology issues. He has litigated disputes involving trademark infringement, patent infringement, false advertising, trade secrets, copyright infringement, the DMCA, dilution, trade dress, parallel imports and counterfeiting before various federal courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Garrity has wide-ranging experience in Internet-related matters, including domain name arbitration proceedings and disputes involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, cybersquatting, “phishing,” meta-tagging, and keyword advertising. He has lectured extensively on discovery and technology.
Duration : 0:6:49
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal
Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
E-Discovering America: Discovery and ethics in the technology era
A lecture presented by the Cardozo Cyberlaw Society, featuring Mr. Paul W. Garrity, Partner, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, on Columbus Day, Monday, October 8, 2007.
Technology has been changing the way law is practiced. It can increase efficiency, allow for greater flexibility and provides many other benefits. It also can add much complexity to the process of discovery. Law firms are learning how to deal with the massive amount of work sifting through potentially terabytes of data, looking for what they must provide their opponents, while screening out material that is privileged. In addition, lawyers often face related questions, both technical and ethical:
– What do you do if your opponent sends you an email with metadata that reveals confidential information?
– Who should bear the cost of discovery when it pertains to searching and restoring data from 1980, on ancient storage medium?
– What issues are involved in outsourcing e-discovery to specialized firms?
Every attorney must recognize these issues when they arise – ignoring them comes at the peril of malpractice.
Mr. Garrity, a partner at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, is an expert on legal technology issues. He has litigated disputes involving trademark infringement, patent infringement, false advertising, trade secrets, copyright infringement, the DMCA, dilution, trade dress, parallel imports and counterfeiting before various federal courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Garrity has wide-ranging experience in Internet-related matters, including domain name arbitration proceedings and disputes involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, cybersquatting, “phishing,” meta-tagging, and keyword advertising. He has lectured extensively on discovery and technology.
Duration : 0:9:30
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal
Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
Electronic Discovery in Practice: Discovery and ethics in the technology era
A lecture presented by the Cardozo Cyberlaw Society, featuring Mr. Paul W. Garrity, Partner, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, on Columbus Day, Monday, October 8, 2007.
Technology has been changing the way law is practiced. It can increase efficiency, allow for greater flexibility and provides many other benefits. It also can add much complexity to the process of discovery. Law firms are learning how to deal with the massive amount of work sifting through potentially terabytes of data, looking for what they must provide their opponents, while screening out material that is privileged. In addition, lawyers often face related questions, both technical and ethical:
– What do you do if your opponent sends you an email with metadata that reveals confidential information?
– Who should bear the cost of discovery when it pertains to searching and restoring data from 1980, on ancient storage medium?
– What issues are involved in outsourcing e-discovery to specialized firms?
Every attorney must recognize these issues when they arise – ignoring them comes at the peril of malpractice.
Mr. Garrity, a partner at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, is an expert on legal technology issues. He has litigated disputes involving trademark infringement, patent infringement, false advertising, trade secrets, copyright infringement, the DMCA, dilution, trade dress, parallel imports and counterfeiting before various federal courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Garrity has wide-ranging experience in Internet-related matters, including domain name arbitration proceedings and disputes involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, cybersquatting, “phishing,” meta-tagging, and keyword advertising. He has lectured extensively on discovery and technology.
Duration : 0:7:46
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal
Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
Electronic Discovery in Practice: Discovery and ethics in the technology era
A lecture presented by the Cardozo Cyberlaw Society, featuring Mr. Paul W. Garrity, Partner, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, on Columbus Day, Monday, October 8, 2007.
Technology has been changing the way law is practiced. It can increase efficiency, allow for greater flexibility and provides many other benefits. It also can add much complexity to the process of discovery. Law firms are learning how to deal with the massive amount of work sifting through potentially terabytes of data, looking for what they must provide their opponents, while screening out material that is privileged. In addition, lawyers often face related questions, both technical and ethical:
– What do you do if your opponent sends you an email with metadata that reveals confidential information?
– Who should bear the cost of discovery when it pertains to searching and restoring data from 1980, on ancient storage medium?
– What issues are involved in outsourcing e-discovery to specialized firms?
Every attorney must recognize these issues when they arise – ignoring them comes at the peril of malpractice.
Mr. Garrity, a partner at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, is an expert on legal technology issues. He has litigated disputes involving trademark infringement, patent infringement, false advertising, trade secrets, copyright infringement, the DMCA, dilution, trade dress, parallel imports and counterfeiting before various federal courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Garrity has wide-ranging experience in Internet-related matters, including domain name arbitration proceedings and disputes involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, cybersquatting, “phishing,” meta-tagging, and keyword advertising. He has lectured extensively on discovery and technology.
Duration : 0:10:3
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal
Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
September 24, 2008
Speaker: Ilhyung Lee, Edward W. Hinton Professor of Law, University of Missouri School of Law
Presented by: CISCDR (Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Conflict and Dispute Resolution)
Summary: CISCDR Distinguished Scholar-in-Residence Lecture
Does culture play a role in the lawyering process? on dispute resolution methods? What exactly is culture? This lecture will address these important questions. Some commentators and practitioners assert that culture is of little or no consequence in dispute resolution, and that it need not be studied. Professor Lee will address, and largely question, such a view. He urges that culture may be a factor in many disputes, quite significant in some situations, and less so in others. Culture is perhaps most pronounced in the international setting, but is also present in the domestic setting. In all events, the failure to recognize cultural norms and differences may lead to missed opportunities in settlement, or an exacerbation of the dispute. Ultimately, participants in the dispute resolution arena whether parties, counsel, or neutrals must be aware of the presence and impact of culture, toward facilitating fair settlement.
A Senior Fellow at the University of Missouri School of Laws Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, Ilhyung Lee has served as a panelist in domain name disputes administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization. He is a member of the London Court of International Arbitration, the National Arbitration Forum, the U.S. Council for International Business, and the National Sports Law Institute.
Prof. Lee s scholarship addresses comparative approaches to individual rights; the intersection of law, society, and culture in Korea; and the impact of culture on the dispute resolution process. He teaches Comparative Constitutional Law, Cross-Cultural Dispute Resolution, and International Commercial Arbitration. Prof. Lee also writes about intellectual property law and teaches Trademarks and Copyright. He has lectured in Japan as a Fulbright Scholar.
Previously, Prof. Lee practiced law at Cravath, Swaine & Moore (New York) and Kim & Chang (Seoul, Korea). He was law clerk to the Honorable Joseph F. Weis, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. As a law student at Boston College, Prof. Lee was an articles editor on the law review and received his J.D. Order of the Coif. He earned an M.A. degree from Washington College and a B.A. from the University of Maryland.
Duration : 1:0:54
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: Case, Center, CISCDR, Conflict, Culture, Dispute, Ilhyung, Interdisciplinary, Lee, Reserve, Resolution, Study, University, Western
Tags: Case, Center, CISCDR, Conflict, Culture, Dispute, Ilhyung, Interdisciplinary, Lee, Reserve, Resolution, Study, University, Western Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
Electronic Discovery in Practice: Discovery and ethics in the technology era
A lecture presented by the Cardozo Cyberlaw Society, featuring Mr. Paul W. Garrity, Partner, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, on Columbus Day, Monday, October 8, 2007.
Technology has been changing the way law is practiced. It can increase efficiency, allow for greater flexibility and provides many other benefits. It also can add much complexity to the process of discovery. Law firms are learning how to deal with the massive amount of work sifting through potentially terabytes of data, looking for what they must provide their opponents, while screening out material that is privileged. In addition, lawyers often face related questions, both technical and ethical:
– What do you do if your opponent sends you an email with metadata that reveals confidential information?
– Who should bear the cost of discovery when it pertains to searching and restoring data from 1980, on ancient storage medium?
– What issues are involved in outsourcing e-discovery to specialized firms?
Every attorney must recognize these issues when they arise – ignoring them comes at the peril of malpractice.
Mr. Garrity, a partner at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, is an expert on legal technology issues. He has litigated disputes involving trademark infringement, patent infringement, false advertising, trade secrets, copyright infringement, the DMCA, dilution, trade dress, parallel imports and counterfeiting before various federal courts and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Garrity has wide-ranging experience in Internet-related matters, including domain name arbitration proceedings and disputes involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, cybersquatting, “phishing,” meta-tagging, and keyword advertising. He has lectured extensively on discovery and technology.
Duration : 0:7:50
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal
Tags: discovery, E-discovery, law, legal Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
Peter Adediran has been admitted as a solicitor in England and Wales since April 1999 and speaks the language of Internet-oriented businesses. In 2001, he wrote one of the first books in the United Kingdom regarding domain name disputes. It is on this strong foundation that the firm is built. To clean up the Internet and resolve disputes arising out of a Web prescence. This is a short video of who what he does.
Duration : 0:0:49
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: Cleaning up the Web, Domain Name Disputes
Tags: Cleaning up the Web, Domain Name Disputes Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
A Copyright claim was filed on this video by withmacedonia.org
This video is uploaded with the express permission of youtube user rempetisa
http://www.youtube.com/user/rempetisa
withmacedonia.org registrant details from the PUBLIC DOMAIN REGSTRANT SERVER are as follows:
Domain ID154029363-LROR
Domain Name:WITHMACEDONIA.ORG
Created On:09-Sep-2008 09:14:54 UTC
Last Updated On:12-May-2009 09:47:28 UTC
Expiration Date:09-Sep-2010 09:14:54 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Melbourne IT, Ltd. dba Internet Names Worldwide (R52-LROR)
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:C122094350099638
Registrant Name:Jason Miko
Registrant Organization:Jason Miko
Registrant Street1:215 E. Crooked Stick Dr.
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Tucson
Registrant State/Province:AZ
Registrant Postal Code:85737
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.5205759330
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:
Admin ID:C122094350099635
Admin Name:Jason Miko
Admin Organization:Jason Miko
Admin Street1:215 E.
Mr Miko’s endorsment of a politically natured video through a website endorsing cultural sponsorship, especially a video where he stands to profit as producer is questionable in itself.
It is however an open attempt to suppress the truth of this video by an organization which claimes it promotes FYROMs culture.
The minimal footage that was included in this video was not a reproduction of the movies nor did anyone involved benefit financially in any way shape or form. Utilizing the Freedom of Speech Act, this video is a review of the two movies in question highlighted by existing events and policies that exposed the propagandistic content of both movies.
All offending content has been removed.
To withmacedonia.org
Truth will not be gagged.
The fraud:
A Name is a Name is a film conceived and developed by Icelander Sigurjon Einarsson. Though he now lives in Norway working with rock and roll artists, Sigurjon is a filmmaker by profession.
A cross between a documentary and a feature film, A Name is a Name is instead, a classic road film’, made largely on the proverbial and literal road over a period of seven months in the Republic of Macedonia.
At its heart, the film is about a people who call themselves Macedonians and what it means to them to be known as such.
The Truth
A Name is a Name and Ellada the other Greece are films conceived and developed by the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and their collaborators for the pure purpose of deceiving the American public and the international community by Demonizing the Greeks and making victims of themselves.
The Film Fund of FYROM which operates with close cooperation and support from the Government of FYROM, pseudo academics and lobbyists have been dispatched around the world as part of a propagandistic push to wrest the historical name of Macedonia away from the indigenous Macedonians of Greece who can link to it in every way, in order to fulfill territorial claims and push an irredentist agenda.
A documentary implies that there is truth to what is documented yet no such documentation exists. Ellada The other Greece beyond assumptions and propaganda holds no valid or credible documentation of the existence of Nick Stoyan or of the events herein. A name is a name is a biased one sided view that is assumptive in its content and biased in its presentation.
Both videos disregard the cultural link, and 4000 year old history of the Macedonians of Greece focusing only on what it means for them to achieve the theft of the name.
It is synonymous to a criminal who plays the victim card by showing us what it would mean to him to own your car, and demonizing you, the owner for not allowing him to steal it with your blessing.
Duration : 0:9:55
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: .us, a-ha, Airforce, America, Army, balkan, Balkans, communist, democracy, Dispute, east, Einarsson, ELLADA, EU, Europe, European, GREECE, Greek, Harket, Hellas, is, Jason, MACEDONIA, Makedonia, Makedonija, Marines, Miko, Morten, name, NATO, NICK, northern, of, OTAN, OTHER, propaganda, region, Sigurjon, states, STOYAN, Trailer, truth, Union, united, veto
Tags: .us, a-ha, Airforce, America, Army, balkan, Balkans, communist, democracy, Dispute, east, Einarsson, ELLADA, EU, Europe, European, GREECE, Greek, Harket, Hellas, is, Jason, MACEDONIA, Makedonia, Makedonija, Marines, Miko, Morten, name, NATO, NICK, northern, of, OTAN, OTHER, propaganda, region, Sigurjon, states, STOYAN, Trailer, truth, Union, united, veto Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
November 13, 2009
Lunch Lecture: “Dispute Resolution under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy”
Speaker: Jeffrey Samuels, David L. Brennan Professor of Law; Director, Center for Intellectual Property Law and Technology; University of Akron School of Law
Speaker introduction: Professor Jacqueline Lipton, Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Duration : 0:52:7
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: .in, and, Case, Cyberspace, Dispute, domain, law, name, names, of, online, policy, Reserve, Resolution, school, Signifiers, the, Trademarks, under, Uniform, University, Western
Tags: .in, and, Case, Cyberspace, Dispute, domain, law, name, names, of, online, policy, Reserve, Resolution, school, Signifiers, the, Trademarks, under, Uniform, University, Western Posted in Domain Name Disputes
Posted January 12th, 2010
by admin
November 13, 2009
Panel 3: “Internet Domain Name Dispute Resolution”
Moderator: Professor Jacqueline Lipton, Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Panelists:
Ilhyung Lee, Edward W. Hinton Professor of Law, Senior Fellow, Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, University of Missouri School of Law
Paul D. McGrady, Jr., Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig; author, McGrady on Domain Names
Duration : 1:9:32
Read the rest of this entry »
Technorati Tags: .in, and, Case, Cyberspace, Dispute, domain, internet, law, name, names, of, online, Reserve, Resolution, school, Signifiers, Trademarks, University, Western
Tags: .in, and, Case, Cyberspace, Dispute, domain, internet, law, name, names, of, online, Reserve, Resolution, school, Signifiers, Trademarks, University, Western Posted in Domain Name Disputes